First-piece exception and assessor handoff

MFG-CV01-P03 · Concept training procedure draft · D1 · 29 October 2026

For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.

Equipment MFG-CV01 · model 1.0.0-concept · source: original concept, approved SOP absent.

1. Confirm equipment and task identity.

   MFG-CV01 · Conveyor changeover rig. Record draft D1 and model 1.0.0-concept.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

2. Confirm the inert training boundary.

   For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

3. Locate SAMPLE-01 between the rails.

   A rendered sample is context; it is not dimensional evidence.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

4. Record the target FMT-B and block GB-B2 r2.

   Keep configuration identity with the attempt.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

5. Ask whether a first-piece criterion is present.

   The supplied concept has none; select HOLD in the practice.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

6. Reject an acceptance based on appearance alone.

   No image demonstrates torque, clearance or dimensional tolerance.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

7. Separate learner recovery from physical conformity.

   A corrected part decision may pass practice while physical acceptance remains open.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

8. Specify the evidence to request.

   Current inspection criterion, measurement record, sample identity and reviewer authority.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

9. Prepare the source-linked review note.

   Include initial wrong choice, hold, recovery and the missing first-piece evidence.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

10. Hand the decision to the qualified reviewer.

    No restart, production release or certificate is issued by this page.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

11. Prepare the evidence record.

    Record observations, source revisions, holds, recovery and missing physical evidence; do not invent a result.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

12. Request qualified review before reuse.

    Keep this draft unapproved until the task owner accepts the sources, geometry, criteria, permissions and revision.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

Qualified source, geometry and procedure review required before operational reuse.