MFG-EL01-P03 | Drawing mismatch and engineering handover
Concept training procedure draft · D1 · 29 October 2026
For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.
Equipment: MFG-EL01
Model: 1.0.0-concept
Source basis: Original authored concept; no approved customer/OEM SOP supplied.

01. Confirm equipment and task identity.
Evidence: MFG-EL01 · Control-cabinet revision trainer. Record draft D1 and model 1.0.0-concept.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

02. Confirm the inert training boundary.
Evidence: For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

03. Describe a cabinet label that differs from the drawing.
Evidence: Preserve both identifiers exactly.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

04. Pause the proposed maintenance instruction.
Evidence: A mismatch cannot be resolved by appearance alone.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

05. Record the equipment and drawing revision.
Evidence: Unknown versions remain explicitly unknown.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

06. Separate observed layout from assumed circuit function.
Evidence: The concept has no wires, live data or functional logic.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

07. Request the engineering change history.
Evidence: The source owner decides which revision applies.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

08. Retain the exception and supporting observations.
Evidence: Do not overwrite the original mismatch with a guessed correction.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

09. Submit the proposed knowledge update for qualified review.
Evidence: Only approved, permitted changes belong in a released lesson.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

10. Keep the physical task on hold.
Evidence: The website grants no electrical work, testing or restart authority.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

11. Prepare the evidence record.
Evidence: Record observations, source revisions, holds, recovery and missing physical evidence; do not invent a result.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

12. Request qualified review before reuse.
Evidence: Keep this draft unapproved until the task owner accepts the sources, geometry, criteria, permissions and revision.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.