MFG-PK01-P01 | Expert context and format identity
Concept training procedure draft · D1 · 29 October 2026
For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.
Equipment: MFG-PK01
Model: 1.0.0-concept
Source basis: Original authored concept; no approved customer/OEM SOP supplied.

01. Confirm equipment and task identity.
Evidence: MFG-PK01 · Packaging change-part bench. Record draft D1 and model 1.0.0-concept.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

02. Confirm the inert training boundary.
Evidence: For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

03. Locate HUB-01 and SHAFT-01.
Evidence: Name the removable concept part and its fixed locating reference.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

04. Find KEY-01.
Evidence: Record why orientation needs a source-defined relationship.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

05. Locate GUIDE-PK01.
Evidence: Identify the transfer-guide context without inventing a gap value.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

06. Compare PART-PK-A and PART-PK-B.
Evidence: Keep previous and target format identities separate.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

07. Ask the expert why the target part is chosen.
Evidence: Capture the source or experience behind the decision, with permission.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

08. Identify an exception the setup sheet does not explain.
Evidence: Record it as an expert observation, not a released instruction.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

09. List source and interview permissions.
Evidence: Reuse rights and review responsibility must be explicit.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

10. Prepare the next-shift questions.
Evidence: Unresolved key/shaft fit and guide criteria remain open.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

11. Prepare the evidence record.
Evidence: Record observations, source revisions, holds, recovery and missing physical evidence; do not invent a result.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

12. Request qualified review before reuse.
Evidence: Keep this draft unapproved until the task owner accepts the sources, geometry, criteria, permissions and revision.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.