MFG-PK01-P03 | Reviewed handover and lesson update
Concept training procedure draft · D1 · 29 October 2026
For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.
Equipment: MFG-PK01
Model: 1.0.0-concept
Source basis: Original authored concept; no approved customer/OEM SOP supplied.

01. Confirm equipment and task identity.
Evidence: MFG-PK01 · Packaging change-part bench. Record draft D1 and model 1.0.0-concept.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

02. Confirm the inert training boundary.
Evidence: For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

03. Write the previous and requested format identifiers.
Evidence: Preserve context so the next shift can interpret the note.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

04. Record the expert reasoning separately from approved steps.
Evidence: Do not silently turn tacit advice into an operating SOP.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

05. Add the key/shaft exception and source gap.
Evidence: An exception without evidence remains an open question.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

06. Select a proposed change to the training draft.
Evidence: Explain what learner decision the change improves.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

07. Attach the source revision and reuse permission.
Evidence: Both are required for a durable lesson update.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

08. Request task-owner and assessor review.
Evidence: The person with release authority accepts or rejects the proposal.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

09. Retain the previous draft revision.
Evidence: The next lesson must be traceable to the approved change.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

10. Close only the reviewed knowledge action.
Evidence: No automatic propagation to equipment or robot tasks occurs.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

11. Prepare the evidence record.
Evidence: Record observations, source revisions, holds, recovery and missing physical evidence; do not invent a result.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

12. Request qualified review before reuse.
Evidence: Keep this draft unapproved until the task owner accepts the sources, geometry, criteria, permissions and revision.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.