MANUFACTURING / WORK INTELLIGENCE
Image libraryPracticeEON AI Ventures ↗

Home / Pick/place task decomposition

Concept training procedure draft

Pick/place task decomposition

MFG-RB01-P02 · Robot task development cell · 12 steps for inert model familiarisation and reviewed decision practice.

Read the draft before the model.

Concept training procedure draft · D1 · 29 October 2026

For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.

Original authored concept; no approved customer/OEM SOP supplied.

MFG-RB01-P02MFG-RB01MODEL 1.0.0-concept
HTML download TXT download JSON download

12 authored steps

A sequence with visible evidence gates.

  1. Confirm equipment and task identity.

    MFG-RB01 · Robot task development cell. Record draft D1 and model 1.0.0-concept.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

  2. Confirm the inert training boundary.

    For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

  3. Select GRIP-L and GRIP-R.

    Use Guide travel to inspect illustrative jaw closure.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

  4. Compare the jaws with WORKPIECE-01.

    No friction, force or gripper validation is simulated.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

  5. Use Block lift for the workpiece concept.

    The vertical motion explains a task phase, not a collision-free trajectory.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

  6. Identify the pick reference.

    A real task needs calibrated frames and sensing.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

  7. Identify the place reference.

    Placement tolerance and support conditions require an approved source.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

  8. Describe a missing-workpiece exception.

    Define a required stop/escalation outcome before programming hardware.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

  9. Reset the scene.

    No robot joints are driven and no controller commands are produced.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

  10. Prepare the integrator test questions.

    Request collision, reach, payload, stopping and safeguarding validation.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

  11. Prepare the evidence record.

    Record observations, source revisions, holds, recovery and missing physical evidence; do not invent a result.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

  12. Request qualified review before reuse.

    Keep this draft unapproved until the task owner accepts the sources, geometry, criteria, permissions and revision.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

Keep the equipment and source together.

Open Robot task development cell

Referenced components: ROBOT-BASE, ROBOT-SHOULDER, ROBOT-ELBOW, ROBOT-WRIST, GRIP-L, GRIP-R, PICK-NEST, PLACE-NEST.

Required operating inputs: Robot make/controller and limits; gripper/workpiece CAD; sensing; safeguarded cell design; integrator-approved test plan.